◇ why c
Why this speed, not some other?
Why this specific stiffness, giving this specific speed? The framework is honest: the microscopic parameters that set the pond's stiffness and density aren't derived from anything deeper in this work. They're inputs.
With those properties in place, and in the smooth, large-scale signal regime, the model recovers the familiar result: light has one shared speed inside our world, and clocks and rulers made from wave-like matter behave the way relativity says.
This is a proper scientific stance: the theory explains a route to operational Lorentz behavior in the sectors checked so far. It does not yet prove that every possible correction channel is invisible, and it does not explain why the measured number has its specific value. Those remain marked as scope boundaries.